Ukrainian Farmers are working war-time

The Ukrainian Agriculture industry is plowing on despite the Russian invasion

By Greg Kennedy + Kyran Berlin

Food prices are expected to rise across Europe due to the blockade of exports in Ukraine. (Photo: Courtesy of the EU parliament multimedia center, 20th April)

It’s no surprise that the Ukrainian agriculture industry has taken a huge hit since the Russian invasion – however despite the setbacks from Russian invaders, Ukrainian farmers are plowing on. The main problem now for the industry is moving the goods to war-torn areas and other countries, as seaports are blocked by Russian troops and many methods of transport are no longer viable.

Agricultural workers of Ukraine are currently utilizing 72% of the farmland used pre-invasion, about 13.8 million hectares. The rest is occupied by the Russians, according to Ukrainian Agribusiness Club (UCAB) Analyst Svitlana Lytvyn.

Before the war, Ukraine’s main method of exporting goods was through their seaports, one of their biggest being in Odessa. However, the Russians continue to occupy these, blocking exports. 

“Farmers have left products, the volumes of which exceed the internal needs of Ukraine and were intended for export and export earnings. Now there is practically no opportunity to sell these products,” said Lytvyn.

Anne Poulsen, director of the UN World Food Programme’s Nordic Office thinks that this blockage of exports is going to have a devastating impact in the poorest parts of the world. 

“When the price of food and fuel prices increase in countries like Somalia or Sudan or Yemen or Afghanistan, I mean, this is really devastating. This is alarming for people… So ultimately, this will be a matter of life and death.” Poulsen said.

Ukraine produces enough food to feed 400 million people across the world, while they themselves are only a country of 14 million. Ukraine and Russia are often referred to as the world’s ‘Breadbasket’.

Lytvyn said that, “Foreign trade did not stop during the war,” however there are major issues with transporting the excess goods that the Ukrainian farmers have produced. The seaports are not the only problem, the only other trade routes are via the Danube river to ports in Romania or via rail through western Ukraine.”

Both methods have a myriad of complications – for example to go by rail requires negotiating with un-willing EU railway operators and changing wheels to fit a different width of tracks between the EU and Ukraine.

Much like the rest of Ukraine, the agriculture industry is stubborn, strong and continues to fight despite the obvious threats. “The main task now is to find alternative supply channels,” says Lytvyn.

To hear more about food supply in Russian-occupied regions of Ukraine, listen to the Ukraine DMJX EU Pod here.


(EU & Ukraine Flag Photo: Greg Kennedy. Wheat photo: CC image via Pixabay. Cover graphic: Kyran Berlin)

The DMJX EU Pod: Will Russia’s invasion lead to a global food shortage?

[TRANSCRIPT]

INTRO

GREG:

Hello and welcome to the DMJX EU Report. 

Presenting is myself, Greg Kennedy…

KYRAN:

And I’m Kyran Berlin.

GREG:

Today we dive into the story of Ukrainian farmers still working despite the war-time conditions and how Russia’s invasion has changed Ukraine’s food landscape. 

But first, a roundup of the most recent news out of Ukraine.

KYRAN:

It’s Tuesday afternoon.

A Safe Passage Operation is underway in Ukraine to evacuate people from the Azovstal steel plant, where Ukrainians were forced to take refuge some weeks ago to escape Russian advances. NPR reports that 100 people have been evacuated from the plant, but more remain inside, including at least 20 children.

“Powerful explosions” were heard in the Russian city of Belgorod this morning, raising global concern that fighting in Ukraine may have spilled over the borders of both Russia and Moldova.

Finally, the US warned that Moscow may be planning on annexing parts of Ukraine by creating a sham referenda in mid-May and fabricating votes, according to the latest report from the US Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe.

Now on to our main story.

MAIN STORY

GREG:

Earlier this week Russian troops raided approximately $5 million worth of tractors and farming equipment from a John Deere dealership in Melitopol, according to CNN.

However, after hauling the heavy machinery 700 miles to Chechnya, the plunderers found that the equipment had already been remotely disabled and were unusable.

This heist was part of a continued saga on the second war raging in Ukraine – that of the nation’s food and agricultural security, which Russia has pressured with port shutoffs, strategic targeting of agricultural areas and denial of humanitarian aid for Ukranians sheltered in hard-hit areas like Kyiv and Mariupol.

The UN warned that millions of Ukranians may be facing acute food insecurity in the coming months due to the ongoing conflict.

KYRAN: 

In response, the World Food Programme has deployed staff on the ground to help with distributing rations and aid, but not without some difficulties posed by Russian troops. We spoke with Anne Poulsen, Director of WFP’s Nordic Branch, in mid April about the org’s current operations in Ukraine:

Some 50 days before we spoke the WFP had absolutely nothing in Ukraine…And bear in mind that this is the fastest growing humanitarian crisis in recent history… at this point we have 300 staff on the ground.”

“Right now, the WFP is providing food for one or food assistance for 1.4 million people, and are scaling up to reach a total of 6 million people inside of Ukraine. In addition to those 6 million people, they’re assisting people who have fled the country war in the border countries to Ukraine. So that’s another 300,000 people that the WFP is assisting outside of the borders of Ukraine”

However, while many Ukranians face a denial of access to food, others in the agricultural sector have harvested a surplus of it, but without safe routes to transport it for sale.

This adds to a global pinch on food supplies and other goods provided by Russia and Ukraine, which together provide about 40% of the world’s grains. 

GREG:

Beyond the besieged cities, many farms across Russian-occupied regions of Ukraine have also faced shellings, threats and limits to their operation because of Russian presence, says Svitlana Lytvyn, an analyst with Ukrainian AgriBusiness Club.

“There is unused farmland in the zone of active hostilities (parts of the Donetsk, Luhansk, Kherson and Kharkiv regions for example). And some areas have already been liberated from occupation, but it is impossible to carry out sowing on their territories due to the mining of fields and the destroyed material and technical base.” 

Lytvyn (LYTVIN)  added that “in addition, up to 10-15% of the fields in the combat areas are contaminated with the remains of shells and mines, there are fields blocked due to road mines. Mined fields are one of the factors that do not allow timely sowing… Work has already begun on demining these territories by the relevant services, but this process is quite lengthy and it is very unlikely that they will have time to carry out a sowing campaign in these territories” 

KYRAN:

Copa-Cogeca, an organization of farmers and agri-cooperatives in the EU, have pledged to maintain reliable food supplies to Europe as the conflict continues, and many Member States are assisting in supplying food donations, logistical support and humanitarian aid to Ukraine.

The WFP has purchased roughly 12,000 metric tonnes of wheat from Ukraine with the goal of supporting the nation’s local economy, in addition to providing rations and cash stipends in heavily impacted areas.

GREG:

As for the 72% of Ukrainian farmers who can continue their work, they still face uncertainty over where and how their harvest can be sold.

“Foreign trade did not stop during the war. Ukraine produces much more agricultural products than its own needs, and therefore can export a considerable amount of food without threatening its food security. There are practically no significant administrative restrictions on the export of grain, vegetable oils and most other agricultural products from Ukraine. The main task is to find alternative supply channels.”

Lytvyn summarized the situation by saying, “There will be no famine in Ukraine, but the world will be facing a global food shortage.”

Thanks for joining us here at DMJX EU Report.

(Exit).

The World’s Breadbasket under siege: EU adapts farming as Ukraine conflict continues

The World’s Breadbasket under siege: EU adapts farming as Ukraine conflict continues

The war between two of the world’s largest grain exporters has raised fears about global shortages, but how valid are these concerns?

By Kyran Berlin & Greg Kennedy

The EU AGRI Committee exchanges views on supportive farming systems with Roman Leshchenko, Ukrainian Minister for Agriculture on 22 March, 2022. (Photo: Courtesy of European Parliament Multimedia Centre.)

Russian tanks lug stolen and vandalized tractors through city streets. Golden fields littered with shrapnel from shellings, and close to a quarter of farmlands have been abandoned altogether. 

The country that was until recently considered the ‘Breadbasket of the World’ is under siege, leaving thousands of Ukranians food insecure and global policymakers scrambling to dodge a wave of shortages on the world food market.

According to the UN World Food Programme, together Ukraine and Russia produce roughly 40% of the globe’s grain supply, primarily in the form of livestock feed, cereals and protein crops. Additionally, sanctions and bans structured after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine have also meant the loss of Russian oil, fertilizers, sugar and grains, which Europe is largely dependent on. 

Statistics provided by the European Parliament show that in 2021, Russia was the third-largest partner for EU imports of goods (7.5%), and the fifth largest partner in EU exports (4.1%).

In April, the European Commission issued a statement that Europe is largely self-sufficient in its food production and thus Europeans should not expect food scarcity caused by the war, but rather climbing prices in sugar, cooking oil and animal products as the war and sanctions press on.

Unlike most of Europe, the brunt of these shortages will be felt in poorer countries around the world – particularly those already affected by hunger. 

“Having a country that used to feed the world, that used to be the Breadbasket of the World, now depending on food systems in less than two months is quite absurd.”

– Anne poulsen

Anne Poulsen, Director of the WFP’s Nordic Branch, warned that the shock to the global supply chain caused by the conflict will be a ‘matter of life and death’ for thousands living in areas such as Sudan, Yemen and Afghanistan.

“When you in the first place are struggling to put food on the table for people or for your family, for your children, a 1% increase or 2% increase in prices can really be the difference between whether you can put the next meal on the table or not,” Poulsen explained.

Additionally, 115.4 million people receive food assistance from organizations like WFP every year, many in the form of food rations designed around available crops. According to Poulsen, about 50% of the WFP’s grains for rations are sourced from Ukraine, meaning the expected decline of their exports will require a reshaping of food assistance around the globe.

Now, the WFP has set up food and cash distribution centers for food insecure Ukranians limited to Russian-occupied areas of the state, and in conflict areas like Mariupol and Kyiv.

“Having a country that used to feed the world, that used to be the Breadbasket of the World, now depending on food systems in less than two months is quite absurd.” Poulsen said.

Flags fly outside the European Commission building In Brussels. In April, the European Commission announced temporary plans to expand farming in Member States to compensate for supply shortages from Ukraine. (Photo: Greg Kennedy)

To mitigate global hunger, the EU has pledged at least €2.5 billion for development and humanitarian aid to strengthen food systems in 70 food insecure partner countries between now and 2024. Another €330 million will come from a EU Emergency Support Programme to Ukraine to help meet basic needs and protection.

In early April, the European Commission announced plans to allow tilling of new farmlands across Europe as a ‘temporary’ measure to avoid price inflation caused by the conflict. This would allow for increased production of feed grains, sugar and oilseeds within member states following what is shaping to be a ‘surplus’ harvest in 2022, according to the EC.

A handful of member states, such as France, have been pushing for Europe’s agricultural independence from soybean and protein crop imports from Russia and the Americas prior to the February 24 invasion of Ukraine as part of a broader agenda for EU sovereignty in trade and defence.

However, the push for food independence in the EU is not without its consequences to the environment. Environmental advocates have been critical of the EU’s procurement of new fallow land, as farming virgin land strips ecosystems of biodiversity and requires additional logistical support for foreign crops to grow outside of their natural conditions. 

It’s also a costly move to the existing Green Deal, as the temporary fix pushes Europe away from its Fit for 55 goals for more sustainable farming systems.

“At the EU-level, there is a consensus about the need to address these issues through different means,” said Asger Christensen, MEP and member of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development. “We must find the right balance between biodiversity and climate protection, while still being able to fill up the plates.”

Adding to the pressure on Europe’s agricultural industry is the two-thirds cutoff from Russian natural gas, which accounts for 41% of the EU’s gas imports and is essential to production of fertilizers, pesticides, and is used in operating farming equipment. In 2021, Europe bought $2.11 billion USD worth of Russian fertilizers according to data from United Nations COMTRADE.

“As of now, the EU is quite dependent on stable imports of both feedstock and fertilizers from Russia and Ukraine (and third countries in general). Therefore, every policy must consider this.” Christensen said.

As an alternative plan to farming more of Europe, some see the cutoff as an opportunity to advance sustainable agricultural systems and become less dependent on Russia’s chemical additives.

Frans Timmermans, Executive Vice-President for the European Green Deal, warned fellow EU members against inciting panic over supply shortages in Europe and advocated for greener alternatives and continued transition toward sustainable farming systems in lieu of compensating for Russian exports.

The EU’s derailing from sustainable farming systems still threatens to harm the global food supply in the long run, said Professor Piet Van der Meer, who runs a multidisciplinary program on creating sustainable, resilient and adaptable global food systems at Vrije Universiteit Brussel.

According to Van der Meer, Europe’s farming practices are unsustainable as they are, as adapting land, overusing chemicals and water to house non-native crops takes a toll on the land in use and its surrounding ecosystems.

“If we keep on changing the environment, adding stuff to the environment, changing it in order to add [foreign] crops from the one point we run into the limits.” Van der Meer said.

Instead, Van der Meer advocates for maximizing efficiency in local food systems by growing local crops engineered to be more resilient, as opposed to adapting with increased water, pesticide, and environmental augmentation.

“There is a ton of research being done by public research institutions to make local crops more resilient… more nutritious… We need to make sure that we can make the tools available that the local communities can produce more and then preferably be their own crops.” Van der Meer said.  

Miriam Garcia Ferrer, EC spokesperson for Trade and Agriculture, echoed the need for more sustainable food systems as a long-run solution to strengthen global food systems.

“We need to reduce globally the dependency on fossil fuels and continue pushing and action for a transition of the global food systems toward more sustainability,” Ferrer stated. “The Farm to Fork Strategy and the Biodiversity strategy will be key in the EU as well as the green partnerships and coalitions the EU is developing with third countries.”

From the other side, farmers and agricultural organizations are also pressuring the EU for increased support as the prices of oil, livestock feed, and other essentials climb, in addition to securing new farmland.

Copa-Cogeca, an umbrella organization of agricultural cooperatives in the EU, issued a press statement in support of the EC temporary farming strategy to avoid “a hurricane of famine” around the globe caused by the loss of Ukrainian and Russian exports. In the statement, Copa-Cogeca criticized Green Deal proponents, alleging Timmermans’ statements minimized the severity of the situation.

“If we keep on changing the environment, adding stuff to the environment, changing it in order to add [foreign] crops from the one point we run into the limits.”

– PROF. PIET VAN DER MEER

“Copa-Cogeca does not oppose agriculture and environment, farmers will know how to produce better and sustainably. Food chains will break down in the most dependent countries worldwide, and Europe cannot be selfish and inward-looking in this context.” Quoted the statement published 30 March.

In addition to the new farmlands, a joint statement from Copa-Cogeca and other agri-cooperatives asked for continued support from the EU in the form of affordable energy for farmers, maintaining single market integrity to keep trade flowing, and avoiding sensationalism that can lead to panic-buying and stockpiling by EU consumers.

In the meantime, global aid foundations like the WFP are seeking increased donations to adapt and continue issuing food aid around the globe. 

“Right here right now, the strong appeal is the desperate appeal is ready for additional funding so we can continue to save lives.” Poulsen said.

EU Commission’s recent €1.1 billion carbon innovation investments explained

by Olivia Wynkoop and Maren Krämer

The European Commission Charlemagne building in Brussels – one of the main decision-making settings © Maren Krämer

Storing CO2 under the Earth instead of polluting the air we breathe – this is the concept of the Kairos@C project in the Port of Antwerp, Belgium. Developed by chemical companies Air Liquide and BASF, the project recently recieved €360 billion of the €1.1 billion EU Innovation Fund grants handed to seven large-scale climate projects across Europe. 

It aims to create the first and largest cross-border carbon capture and storage (CCS) value chain to capture, liquify, ship, and permanently store CO2. 

Out of seven large-scale projects that received funding, four are dealing with carbon management technologies. CCS is considered to play a big role in the EU’s ambitious goal to achieve climate neutrality by 2050

According to David Yormesor from the European Investment Bank, the Innovation Fund is implemented by the European Commission with the assistance of the European Climate, Infrastructure and Environment Executive Agency (CINEA), who selected the projects out of 300 applicants. Criteria include the project’s ability to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, the degree of innovation and the project maturity. Potential for Scalability and cost-effectiveness are also considered

EU officials aren’t the only ones included in decisions regarding climate policy, says the EU Watchdog Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO). One report states that lobbyists from the fossil fuel industry regularly meet with decision-makers. CEO further states that “like the tobacco industry was excluded from lobbying on health policy, the fossil fuel industry’s lobbying on climate and energy policy must be curbed.”

In the Commission headquarters in Brussels, countries come together to make EU related decisions. Watchdogs like the Corporate Europe Observatory investigate how much influence industrial lobbies have on the decision-making © Maren Krämer

The World Resources Institute (WRI) is dealing with the implementation and regulation of CCS. While they agree that the industry should not have free reign to set the agenda, they also underline that the companies play a significant role in the process. “Companies likely to deploy this are gonna be companies that have been traditionally engaged in the production of energy or in industrial products”, explains Karl Hausker, Senior Fellow in WRI’s Climate Program. “It’s not necessarily a bad thing that those companies continue to be involved more; it is more likely that they have the expertise that will be needed.”

Nevertheless, other stakeholders can not be forgotten. According to Zachary Byrum, WRI Research Analyst for Climate, there is a risk of perpetuating existing harms if you put carbon capture on old coal plants that are near marginalized or distressed communities. “One thing that we strongly advocate for – and we don’t have all the answers for yet – is how to engage communities and bring them into the decision making process early and often; to see if this technology is appropriate for that facility and if it’s something they want, something that can bring economic benefits.”

The Spokesperson of the Directorate-General Climate Action and other EU officials did not respond to interview requests before publication. 

Read more